Source: The Wrestling Observer Newsletter
It would come as a surprise to likely no one that WWE is resistant toward turning John Cena heel. Cena has been playing the good guy for well over 10 years. His character was later modified to drop the rapper gimmick as WWE moved into its more kid-friendly TV-PG era.
According to a source, WWE is resistant to the idea of Cena turning heel because of the belief that it is not financially viable. As of now, WWE live events featuring Cena average about $60,000 more than live events without Cena. In cities WWE has done before, house shows that feature Cena always do better business than events where he does not appear.
In addition, John Cena’s merchandise is reportedly outselling the entire WWE roster combined after CM Punk left the company and Daniel Bryan being currently out of action. On the flip side, one could probably argue that Cena turning heel and still being a fixture on the shows would not necessarily cause merchandise or house show ticket sales to plummet. When Hulk Hogan turned heel in 1996 it helped revitalize his career and the WCW product, since it became a big turning point for the nWo storyline.
The other problem with the over-reliance on Cena and the lack of building up new main eventers is that it presents a huge problem when Cena is out of action or eventually retires. Cena is 37 and has already dealt with many serious injuries. How many more “miraculous” recoveries can his body take? When Cena is off TV, WWE rarely treats anyone with similar significance. The only reason Daniel Bryan received his push is because the WWE fanbase forced it to happen and rejected Batista’s return. Who is to really say a Cena heel turn would be a financial flop unless you try it? It could allow another budding face to rise to the occasion as an equally powerful star.
100% DIRECT LINK (PHOTOS): John Cena’s HIGH-SCHOOL Prom Photo (**EXTREMELY RARE**)!